

When Philadelphia Flyers general manager Daniel Briere signed Christian Dvorak last July, it was to a short-term, one-year contract that came with no concrete guarantee that he would even finish the season as a member of the club.
Briere’s second contract with Dvorak comes with just a bit more commitment.
On Monday night, the Flyers announced that they had locked up the 29-year old Dvorak to a five-year deal worth $25.75 million, with a $5.15 million cap hit.
“We’re very happy to have Christian be a part of the Philadelphia Flyers for the foreseeable future,” Briere said in a press release that accompanied the deal. “He has played a pivotal role in our team’s success this season and proven to be a reliable, two-way center that can be trusted in all situations. More importantly, he plays a big role in our locker room and has fit in seamlessly to our group and what we are building.”
Had Dvorak underwhelmed in his first season in Philadelphia, it easily could have become his only season in the city of Brotherly Love, and Dvorak might have been shipped out to another club by the trade deadline — especially if the Flyers were floundering the NHL’s basement. Instead, the Flyers remain in the playoff mix with 2025-26’s midpoint rapidly approaching, and Dvorak’s strong work has been a not insignificant part of why. With nine goals and 25 points in 39 games, Dvorak is pacing for 19 goals and 53 points over 82 contests — which would both be career highs.
Dvorak also has formed a successful partnership with Trevor Zegras, the team’s big trade acquisition from the summer. With Zegras largely playing the wing (in a “hybrid” center/wing role that gives him the opportunity to take up center duties more than usual for a winger), the two have spent over 449 minutes together at 5-on-5, with the two directly connecting on 12 Flyers goals so far.


Dvorak’s new contract kicks in starting in 2026-27, and lasts through the 2030-31 season, beginning with Dvorak at age 30 (he turns 30 in February) and ending at age 35. Only Travis Konecny (2032-33) and Owen Tippett (2031-32) are currently locked up further into the future on the Flyers’ books. It’s a legitimate long-term commitment.
And most likely, the Flyers and Dvorak won’t be seeing their partnership end any time soon, either. The Athletic’s Kevin Kurz reported that Dvorak’s deal does include no-trade protection: a no-trade clause in Years 1 & 2, a limited no-trade clause in Years 3 & 4, and no protection in Year 5. A team source confirmed to PHLY that the bulk of Dvorak’s trade protection in the new contract ends after Year 3.
For Dvorak, it’s logical move. He’s fit in well in Philadelphia, forging fast friendships in the Flyers’ locker room and emerging as the team’s most productive and second-most-used (just 23 seconds per night behind Sean Couturier) center.
As for the Flyers, their satisfaction with Dvorak’s play through 39 games and their view of the offseason center market as a thin one likely drove their decision to aggressively move to retain him. They’ve deployed Dvorak in all three situations — even strength, penalty kill and (sparingly) power play — and per Briere, found the prospect of replacing those minutes an impossible one to swallow.
Now, Dvorak no longer is a potential rental player for opposing clubs at the deadline, one likely to be the subject of endless trade rumors through early March. Instead, he’ll remain with the Flyers through the entirety of their playoff push, and beyond, as the club looks to pivot from rebuild to true contention in the coming years.

20 Comments (11 conversations)
trebor
New Flyers just like the old Flyers. This is a CF type deal…
reyo
Except for the increase in cap money, the improvement in defense and goaltending, the acquisition of better depth and skilled prospects, better transparency in explaining their long term goals , not to mention the improvement in the standings and possibility of being a play off team. The only thing about the current Flyers that seem “old” in Philly hockey is the whining of those who love to bathe in their own tears.
Stephen Roenitz
The cap is going up so much and there simply aren’t enough big UFA’s to spend it on. Hayes/Laughton retention coming off the books already covers the entire value of this contract next year. If it goes wrong, the contract will be very easy move any time in year 3-5 as a lot of teams won’t be even close to the cap. I personally like retaining good hockey players but it seems I am in the minority among us chronically online flyers fans.
guadzilla
Exactly this. Given the way the cap is expected to increase, let’s assume it gets to $120MM by 2029. A $5MM cap is 4% of the cap – that would be in the ballpark of what Scott Laughton was making on the Flyers last year. By contrast, Kevin Hayes was approx 7% of the cap. Even if Dvorak becomes an effective 3C in a couple of years in terms of production, it’s still a decent contract.
They need bodies at C and they are very unlikely to get someone comparable for a lot less. And having Dvorak doesnt cost them trade capital, torpedo their cap space or block one of the younger centers. If anything, it also gives them the ability to have Dvorak replaces Coots and get out of Couturier’s contract in a couple of years via buyout, saving them $1MM in cap space AND having a younger player taking the slot.
Matthew Dyckman
But, Charlie, what do you think of the move? AllPHLY’ing minds want to know!
Michael Curran
I listened to Charlie’s podcast. In a nutshell he thinks there is more potential downside to this deal then positives.
Charlie O'Connor
AuthorI did a 40-minute emergency podcast on it last night. At some point, I will write a full-scale analysis of the piece. But I have had no time to do so. Plus, we speak to Briere at 6:15 PM tonight about it, so it’s probably better to hold off until he answers questions on the deal anyway.
jcheim90
I don’t like it, but it fits in line with moves of late. Hopefully they are right about things.
guadzilla
I dont know why people hate the move.
Value is good – Dvorak is playing like a decent 2C – and $5MM/year for that is going to age like a fine wine as the cap increases (Hayes for $6MM/year for similar performance and in another year or two, 60pt 2Cs are going to be making $7-8MM/year). This isnt the flat cap era anymore.
Fits a need – Dvorak has good chemistry with Zegras. And they will have to pay a lot more to get someone comparable in FA.
No long term roadblocks – the timeline is pretty good, as the Cs in the pipeline will likely be hitting their stride 2 years from now. And if Berglund/Nesbitt/Luchanko all develop, thats a GOOD problem to have. It isnt as if any team went “oh no, we have too many centers, this is a disaster”.
Bryan
I saw something from DiMarco, who said they used the Wennberg contract (3×6) as a comp, which backed the Flyers into a corner to keep the AAV down. Is it fair to assume the ask was 3×6 and we instead countered/landed on 5×5.15? If so, that’s an insane choice.
guadzilla
None of us have any idea how the negotiations went, but I dont see a big downside in trying to retain a C on a cheap contract for longer – $5MM/year is going to be 3C money after 3 years. That’s easy to trade, if need be.
At some point, they have to make projections on how a player pans out. Play it too safe and you end up paying market value or above, and dont get any surplus value in the contract. $5MM for a super versatile center is a good gamble to take, especially in a cap-increasing world.
Jonathan Riendeau
Positive message
Justin Chairman
Dvorak would have been a UFA in a weak FA class when the cap is going up and many teams have money to spend, and are especially focused on finding centers. He would have gotten as good if not better a deal in the summer, so he had leverage. If flyers wanted him for next 2-3 years (which I think makes sense) they had to do this. Deal with years 4-5 when they get there.
bjm0822
It’s basically a meh move, somewhat market-driven, but it just feels like another move that keeps them as a middle-of-the-road team. At some point they have to figure out a path to getting a real star or two, along with a top goalie. Otherwise it’s just more of the Hextall era.
guadzilla
You can’t just ignore the rest of the roster while waiting to address 1C.
Bob MCH
Yep. Agree.
Michael Curran
This deal in my opinion is strictly because there is NOTHING in the coming free agent class at this position. All the big names signed extensions so the only chance is via trade and that would bite into the prospect pool and giving up a good young player. (Forester, Tippett, York) So I understand it from that perspective. Here is where this gets dicey for me. If by year 3 it still is Coots and Dvorak at 1C and 2C the Flyers are in some trouble. It means Luchanko is a total bust and I didn’t hear good things about him at the World Juniors and Berglund and Nesbitt are not progressing as hoped.
guadzilla
That’s fair but this also helps them NOT rush Luchanko/Nesbitt – you need SOMEBODY as a placeholder at 1C/2C, and a 60 point C is not a bad option at all.
Michael Curran
I think the only reason he is having a “good year” is playing on a line with Zegras. If Tocchet takes that away and I am not saying he will but Dvorak’s 60 point potential and future more likely settles into the 40 point range
David LaVeck
I am on the fence with this deal, the AAV is fine since it is basically his current rate but the term is about a year or two too much. The no trade protection in year 5 helps so that makes it more of a 4 year deal. Dvorak is playing solid now, I just hope his numbers aren’t directly tied to Zegras. This deal is both an indictment of the FA center market and the Flyers current center depth in the organization.