No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Philadelphia Flyers Community!

Flyers re-sign Christian Dvorak to five-year, $25.75 million contract, lock him up through 2030-31

Charlie O'Connor
Charlie O'Connor
January 6, 2026
Flyers re-sign Christian Dvorak to five-year, $25.75 million contract, lock him up through 2030-31
Dec 30, 2025; Vancouver, British Columbia, CAN; Philadelphia Flyers forward Christian Dvorak (22) handles the puck against the Vancouver Canucks in the second period at Rogers Arena. Mandatory Credit: Bob Frid-Imagn Images

Author

Charlie O'Connor avatar
Charlie O'Connor

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

20 Comments (11 conversations)

trebor

trebor

January 6, 2026

New Flyers just like the old Flyers. This is a CF type deal…

trebor Replying to trebor
reyo

reyo

January 6, 2026

Except for the increase in cap money, the improvement in defense and goaltending, the acquisition of better depth and skilled prospects, better transparency in explaining their long term goals , not to mention the improvement in the standings and possibility of being a play off team. The only thing about the current Flyers that seem “old” in Philly hockey is the whining of those who love to bathe in their own tears.

Stephen Roenitz

Stephen Roenitz

January 6, 2026

The cap is going up so much and there simply aren’t enough big UFA’s to spend it on. Hayes/Laughton retention coming off the books already covers the entire value of this contract next year. If it goes wrong, the contract will be very easy move any time in year 3-5 as a lot of teams won’t be even close to the cap. I personally like retaining good hockey players but it seems I am in the minority among us chronically online flyers fans.

Stephen Roenitz Replying to Stephen Roenitz
guadzilla

guadzilla

January 6, 2026

Exactly this. Given the way the cap is expected to increase, let’s assume it gets to $120MM by 2029. A $5MM cap is 4% of the cap – that would be in the ballpark of what Scott Laughton was making on the Flyers last year. By contrast, Kevin Hayes was approx 7% of the cap. Even if Dvorak becomes an effective 3C in a couple of years in terms of production, it’s still a decent contract.

They need bodies at C and they are very unlikely to get someone comparable for a lot less. And having Dvorak doesnt cost them trade capital, torpedo their cap space or block one of the younger centers. If anything, it also gives them the ability to have Dvorak replaces Coots and get out of Couturier’s contract in a couple of years via buyout, saving them $1MM in cap space AND having a younger player taking the slot.

Matthew Dyckman

Matthew Dyckman

January 6, 2026

But, Charlie, what do you think of the move? AllPHLY’ing minds want to know!

Matthew Dyckman Replying to Matthew Dyckman
Michael Curran

Michael Curran

January 6, 2026

I listened to Charlie’s podcast. In a nutshell he thinks there is more potential downside to this deal then positives.

Matthew Dyckman Replying to Matthew Dyckman
Charlie O'Connor

Charlie O'Connor

Author
January 6, 2026

I did a 40-minute emergency podcast on it last night. At some point, I will write a full-scale analysis of the piece. But I have had no time to do so. Plus, we speak to Briere at 6:15 PM tonight about it, so it’s probably better to hold off until he answers questions on the deal anyway.

jcheim90

jcheim90

January 6, 2026

I don’t like it, but it fits in line with moves of late. Hopefully they are right about things.

guadzilla

guadzilla

January 6, 2026

I dont know why people hate the move.

Value is good – Dvorak is playing like a decent 2C – and $5MM/year for that is going to age like a fine wine as the cap increases (Hayes for $6MM/year for similar performance and in another year or two, 60pt 2Cs are going to be making $7-8MM/year). This isnt the flat cap era anymore.

Fits a need – Dvorak has good chemistry with Zegras. And they will have to pay a lot more to get someone comparable in FA.

No long term roadblocks – the timeline is pretty good, as the Cs in the pipeline will likely be hitting their stride 2 years from now. And if Berglund/Nesbitt/Luchanko all develop, thats a GOOD problem to have. It isnt as if any team went “oh no, we have too many centers, this is a disaster”.

Bryan

Bryan

January 6, 2026

I saw something from DiMarco, who said they used the Wennberg contract (3×6) as a comp, which backed the Flyers into a corner to keep the AAV down. Is it fair to assume the ask was 3×6 and we instead countered/landed on 5×5.15? If so, that’s an insane choice.

Bryan Replying to Bryan
guadzilla

guadzilla

January 6, 2026

None of us have any idea how the negotiations went, but I dont see a big downside in trying to retain a C on a cheap contract for longer – $5MM/year is going to be 3C money after 3 years. That’s easy to trade, if need be.

At some point, they have to make projections on how a player pans out. Play it too safe and you end up paying market value or above, and dont get any surplus value in the contract. $5MM for a super versatile center is a good gamble to take, especially in a cap-increasing world.

Jonathan Riendeau

Jonathan Riendeau

January 6, 2026

Positive message

Justin Chairman

Justin Chairman

January 6, 2026

Dvorak would have been a UFA in a weak FA class when the cap is going up and many teams have money to spend, and are especially focused on finding centers. He would have gotten as good if not better a deal in the summer, so he had leverage. If flyers wanted him for next 2-3 years (which I think makes sense) they had to do this. Deal with years 4-5 when they get there.

bjm0822

bjm0822

January 6, 2026

It’s basically a meh move, somewhat market-driven, but it just feels like another move that keeps them as a middle-of-the-road team. At some point they have to figure out a path to getting a real star or two, along with a top goalie. Otherwise it’s just more of the Hextall era.

bjm0822 Replying to bjm0822
guadzilla

guadzilla

January 7, 2026

You can’t just ignore the rest of the roster while waiting to address 1C.

bjm0822 Replying to bjm0822
Bob MCH

Bob MCH

January 7, 2026

Yep. Agree.

Michael Curran

Michael Curran

January 7, 2026

This deal in my opinion is strictly because there is NOTHING in the coming free agent class at this position. All the big names signed extensions so the only chance is via trade and that would bite into the prospect pool and giving up a good young player. (Forester, Tippett, York) So I understand it from that perspective. Here is where this gets dicey for me. If by year 3 it still is Coots and Dvorak at 1C and 2C the Flyers are in some trouble. It means Luchanko is a total bust and I didn’t hear good things about him at the World Juniors and Berglund and Nesbitt are not progressing as hoped.

Michael Curran Replying to Michael Curran
guadzilla

guadzilla

January 7, 2026

That’s fair but this also helps them NOT rush Luchanko/Nesbitt – you need SOMEBODY as a placeholder at 1C/2C, and a 60 point C is not a bad option at all.

guadzilla Replying to guadzilla
Michael Curran

Michael Curran

January 7, 2026

I think the only reason he is having a “good year” is playing on a line with Zegras. If Tocchet takes that away and I am not saying he will but Dvorak’s 60 point potential and future more likely settles into the 40 point range

David LaVeck

David LaVeck

January 9, 2026

I am on the fence with this deal, the AAV is fine since it is basically his current rate but the term is about a year or two too much. The no trade protection in year 5 helps so that makes it more of a 4 year deal. Dvorak is playing solid now, I just hope his numbers aren’t directly tied to Zegras. This deal is both an indictment of the FA center market and the Flyers current center depth in the organization.

PHLY Flag

Scroll for next article