When Philadelphia Flyers general manager Daniel Briere spoke with the media on July 1, he helpfully provided a likely endpoint for the active portion of the club’s offseason.
“We’re having some discussions with a few teams on a few different things,” he began. “If that doesn’t happen in the next week, there’s a good chance that yeah, what you see is what will be at training camp.”
Well, it’s now eight days later. And with the dust settling on the NHL offseason and both signing and trade activity slowing to a crawl, it’s very plausible that Briere and the Flyers are indeed done.
So what exactly did Briere do? Not much.
He re-signed his pending restricted free agents (namely Bobby Brink and Egor Zamula) to short-term, predictable contracts. He bought out Cam Atkinson to clear cap space and a roster spot at right wing, while giving the respected veteran a chance to catch on elsewhere (he signed with Tampa Bay). He re-signed Erik Johnson to a cheap, one-year contract to serve as the team’s seventh defenseman/blueline mentor. He gave two more contract years to a (very good) fourth liner which will keep him with the club until after he turns 35. He had a relatively uneventful draft, most notable for the fact that he reached slightly relative to public draft rankings on his earlier first round pick, and then traded his second first rounder for a Round 1 pick next year.
If it’s now over, Daniel Briere didn’t exactly have an eye-catching, transaction-heavy big-splash summer.
OK, there was one enormous move left out of that paragraph: Briere brought Matvei Michkov over to the NHL, undeniably a huge organizational win. It will likely be years (if ever) before the public learns just how big of a role the Flyers played in facilitating the termination of the final two years of his KHL contract — whether the Flyers were driving events, were mere passive beneficiaries of events totally out of their control, or somewhere in the middle.
But at the very least, Briere and the Philadelphia front office didn’t mess things up. They kept up a not-adversarial relationship with SKA St. Petersburg (Michkov’s club) and avoided ruffling any feathers that could have torpedoed the termination. That’s important, and warrants praise. The Michkov situation was by far the Flyers’ biggest win of the offseason, and shouldn’t be ignored or discounted just because Briere publicly downplayed the Flyers’ role in making it happen. It’s a massive boost to the organization, both in terms of justifying their gamble at the 2023 draft, and adding the kind of sky-high upside player that the NHL club currently lacks.
But Michkov alone won’t be enough to return the Flyers to Stanley Cup contention, even if he fully lives up to his advance billing.
Take a look at their current roster. Travis Konecny is the Flyers’ best player at the moment, and he doesn’t even appear to be in realistic contention to make Team Canada’s roster for the upcoming Four Nations tournament in 2025, if the public projections are any indication. After Konecny, the Flyers have a number of good players, but none anywhere near great, at least not yet or (in Sean Couturier’s case) not anymore. Perhaps first rounder Jett Luchanko can be the 1C the Flyers don’t have right now, but that will take years, and is a longshot given how difficult it is to unearth first-line centers in the draft, especially outside the top-10. They have a low-key deep blueline corps and prospect pipeline at the position, but no player who screams “potential big-minutes dominant No. 1.”
Michkov may indeed prove to be amazing. But true contenders don’t just have one great player. Edmonton has Connor McDavid — and Leon Draisaitl, and Evan Bouchard, and Zach Hyman. Florida can boast Aleksander Barkov — in addition to Matthew Tkachuk, Sam Reinhart, Gustav Forsling, and Aaron Ekblad. It’s the same with Dallas and Miro Heiskanen, and Colorado with Nathan MacKinnon, and New York with Igor Shesterkin. All flashy, impact stars, and all with lesser flashy impact stars to support them.
Right now, the Flyers — with the possible exception of Konecny — don’t have that for Michkov, on the NHL roster or as sure-things in the pipeline.
In their defense, they know it.
By all accounts — including Briere’s own post-Round 1 admission — the Flyers aggressively attempted to move up into the top-10 of the draft two weeks ago, to secure a player who they thought more likely to be a star than Luchanko. Based on reports and rumors, they’ve checked in on basically every U25 blue-chipper rumored to be available. They know what they need, and they tried to get it this summer.
They just didn’t pull it off.
And again in their defense, they don’t truly have to pull it off just yet. Briere made it clear in the lead-up to the draft that due to the club’s tight salary cap situation — the result of rebuilding-focused stockpiling of assets that added lots of dead money to their books — they’re not really looking to “turn the corner” and attack free agency until 2025 at the earliest, and most likely not before 2026. The 2024-25 season was never going to be a season they targeted for Cup contention — after all, teams with nearly $22 million in dead money on their books don’t contend. The upcoming season can be used as an evaluation/development year for Michkov and the not-insignificant number of young-ish players on the NHL roster with high plausible upside.
It’s not going to kill the rebuild if Matvei Michkov spends his rookie year getting feeds from Morgan Frost or Sean Couturier instead of Trevor Zegras. He’ll survive.
It’s not that largely punting on the 2024 offseason will make it impossible for Briere and the Flyers to ultimately get what they need. It just makes it harder, given that one offseason has now largely passed, and no clear-cut solutions to the organization’s big long-term roster questions have yet emerged.
The tough part to swallow is that it very much appeared that opportunities existed. There were the trade-up attempts, which were so heavily rumored it’s hard to blame fans — particularly online-centric ones — for getting their hopes up. There were two teams in Buffalo and Ottawa obviously desperate after disappointing years who looked poised to make dumb moves — and both did, in the form of an underwhelming return for Jakob Chychrun and a trade of the 2022 9th overall pick for a 3C.
Maybe a trade-up was never possible, given the historical cap-era reticence to trade away top-10 picks. Maybe those specific moves couldn’t have happened for the Flyers; Chychrun in particular made little sense for them. But the stage was set for Briere and the Flyers to be beneficiaries of desperate front offices or to tap into their stockpiled draft picks for a better shot at a star, and they were unable to take advantage.
No matter which way you slice it, they stand as missed opportunities for the kind of action that at some point, the Flyers are going to have to take if they want this rebuild to work, given their unwillingness to execute on the kind of scorched-earth plan that would guarantee an infusion of blue-chip top-5 picks into the organization. And assuming they are largely finished for the summer, the entire offseason can be viewed through that lens as a missed opportunity — especially given their apparent timeline for projected contention.
Which brings us to Travis Konecny.
Briere and the Flyers have made it clear that they want to re-sign Konecny, preferably by the end of this summer, so that the specter of his looming UFA status in the summer of 2025 doesn’t loom over his entire season. Had the Flyers done the opposite — revealed publicly or through strategic leaks that Konecny was available to the highest bidder — it would have sent the message to the fanbase that the front office very much still views this as a long-term, future-focused rebuild.
But their openness to re-signing Konecny to a big-money, long-term deal that kicks in at age 28 implies that the Flyers believe that they can turn the corner relatively quickly. After all, the logic of signing a very-good-but-not-elite player to a huge cap hit over seven or eight seasons through his mid-30s is simple: Yes, the final few years of the deal are likely to be overpays, because the aging curve comes for every player. But the team will get real value in the front half of the contract, while the player is still operating at close-to-peak powers.
For the Flyers to get that value, however, they need to be ready for a move into playoff relevancy by 2025-26 (the first season of a new Konecny deal) or soon after. In other words, unless the Flyers are absolutely convinced that Konecny’s early-to-mid thirties will mirror those of Brad Marchand, re-signing him is inherently a “win-now” move, or at least a “win in the near future” move. Which doesn’t line up with largely sitting out this entire offseason.
If the Flyers’ plan is to chug along, stockpile assets and draft lots of intriguing prospects for 4-5 years in a slow-and-steady, painstaking process, figuring that the rebuild finally “ends” when Michkov hits his prime around age 24, that’s a totally reasonable plan. It’s one I suspect fans would be more open to accepting than perhaps even the organization realizes.
But that plan can’t include re-signing Travis Konecny. The dropoff risk in the back half of the deal is simply too high.
So re-signing Konecny only makes sense if Briere and the Flyers will soon (say, by the 2026 offseason) be adding the kind of high-end talent that this team — even with Michkov and Konecny — is going to need in order to truly contend.
And now, there’s one fewer offseason that Briere and Co. has left to do it.
The result is that now, the 2025 offseason looms extremely large for the entire Flyers organization, as a potential pivot point for their entire plan.
Their ridiculous amount of stockpiled draft capital says as much: three first round picks and three second round picks, in a draft that internally, the Flyers believe to be loaded at the top.
“According to our scouts, next year is a really, really good draft. Really top-heavy,” Briere reiterated on July 1.
Their actions over the past seven months back up their public statements. They nabbed a 2025 second rounder in the Cutter Gauthier/Jamie Drysdale trade, prioritized a 2025 first over a 2024 one in the Sean Walker deal, and then turned the 32nd pick this year into yet another 2025 first on draft day.
Briere is clearly putting a lot of eggs into the 2025 NHL Draft basket. And whether he makes all of those selections to dramatically beef up the pipeline, or uses the excitement surrounding the strong class to convince other GMs to make big trades with him using those picks as chips, it’s setting up to be the key to his rebuilding strategy.
“I can’t wait to be sitting there next year and take advantage of (the extra picks),” he acknowledged.
It doesn’t feel like an overstatement to say that now, given their relatively inactive past two weeks and the mass stockpiling of picks for next summer, the 2025 draft and that offseason as a whole will dictate the success of the Flyers’ rebuild, at least under this leadership group.
And that’s a lot of pressure to be placed upon one single offseason of work.
That said, Briere’s patient, quiet 2024 summer may very well prove justified. If a few of the young-ish roster players take big steps forward in 2024-25, for example, it would change the public perception of their needs. They may lack high-end talent now, yes. But all of Owen Tippett, Cam York, Tyson Foerster, Jamie Drysdale and Joel Farabee have flashed the ability to at least reach Konecny-esque levels of production and value. If even one or two of them take “the leap” this upcoming season, suddenly the NHL roster no longer looks nearly as bereft of impact contributors. And given the fact that those are the players who Briere likely would have needed to relinquish in a 2024 “big splash” trade, it would vindicate his approach even more if they break out in Philadelphia rather than elsewhere.
He’ll also be vindicated if he does indeed nail the now-pivotal 2025 offseason. Then, largely sitting out this summer will play in retrospect as shrewd calculation, as an unwillingness to waste his bullets until the just right trade involving just the right player emerged.
But in the here and now, we don’t have the benefit of future sight. In the here and now, the Flyers still have an organizational talent pool that — even with Michkov officially in the fold — doesn’t appear likely to produce the kind of roster capable of contending for Stanley Cups anytime in the near future.
Hope must now be pinned on significant internal development, a massive 2025 draft haul, or Briere and the front office proving able to get the big wins in the trade market that they couldn’t secure this summer.
That’s far from impossible. The rebuild is not certain to fail.
But assuming Briere does indeed remain quiet over the remainder of this offseason, the degree of difficulty just went up a few more notches.

30 Comments (8 conversations)
Justin Schilling
I would argue that passing on Buium was and will be shown to be a very significant missed opportunity as well.
Charlie O'Connor
AuthorPossibly! We’ll have to see how both Buium and Luchanko develop.
rebusflyer
Given that Buium was passed over by multiple teams, I wonder whether the rumors that his choice of agent (who also represents Gauthier and Johansen) had something to do with the Flyers passing on him.
In the case of Gauthier, the parallels are striking — both college players, both highly-regarded, by some reports close friends (along with Winnipeg’s Rutgers McGroarty, who is also represented by that agent and also seemingly is attempting to force a trade).
Maybe the Flyers felt that agent misled them, or misled Gauthier, or both. As to Johansen, again, maybe the Flyers believe the agent hasn’t been a straight shooter.
Who knows. Have you heard anything along these lines, Charlie?
Charlie O'Connor
AuthorI think it’s possible that the agent factor played a role, but as part of a number of factors, not the sole driving one. If they really, really liked Buium, they presumably would have prioritized making sure the two sides (Flyers and Kurt Overhardt) were on the same page pre-draft and that Buium would not “pull a Gauthier.” I don’t think they liked Buium enough (because of their scouts’ evaluation, because of the size thing on their future defense corps, etc) to work through all of that.
Bryan
It’s pretty simple, Charlie. Just need to trade Konecny, Beezer, and Risto for another 2 firsts and 2 seconds. Then, pray to Bettman that we win the lottery and draft Hagens. I’m ready to get hurt again.
guadzilla
I dont know that this season was a wasted opportunity. Yes, they are losing a year in the rebuild but that is not because of inactivity on Briere’s part but because of their cap situation. So there never really was an opportunity per se to begin with.
The way i see it, they are certainly following a plan.
– This year, take a swing at a higher-upside player in Luchanko over Helenius (after their attempt to get an impact prospect failed)
– Next year, accumulate shed tons of picks and wait for cap space to free up, which will give them the ammo to go after a player or two in trade or FA
That sets them up to be fairly competitive by 2026 – which also happens to be in relatively peak Konecny years.
The devil will lie in the details of who they get – but as a plan goes, it is very sound.
Tyson Robertson
Oh, geez. I don’t know who started this “can’t do anything because of the cap” garbage, but it’s simply ot true. We can still take on bad contracts if we want, and we can still sign/trade any player we want. The cap is notacurrent restraint knowing we have ~10 mill of ltir buffer if we need it.
guadzilla
So here is how that LTIR works.
– If they are cap compliant at the start of the season, then when they put Johansen and Ellis on IR, they get cap relief for that season – so they may be able to make $10MM worth of moves but only after the season starts. But this means they have to carry that cap space now – which most definitely limits what they can do.
In addition, since they cannot bank this cap space, I am not sure if they can use this to pay for Michkov’s expected accrued bonuses. Which means they need to keep some additional cap space free for that purpose – or have those bonuses count against next year’s cap money.
– If they sign a bunch of players and go over the cap, and use the LTIR to become compliant for the start of the season, they only get relief up to the cap (not for the entire salary amount). For simplicity’s sake, let’s assume the cap is $90MM, Ellis’s contract is $6MM and Johansen’s contract is $4MM. If the Flyers are at $97MM, they will need to put both Ellis and Johansen on LTIR but this only gets them to $90MM (not $87MM).
There is some flexibility here – they can go to $94MM over the cap, put Johansen on IR to become cap compliant and then put Ellis on IR after the season starts – which give them an additional $6MM of space.
But they can’t take on a lot more in terms of bad contracts and such – atleast not until the season starts.
Charlie O'Connor
AuthorThis season wasn’t a missed opportunity, in my opinion. There were lots of positive developments.
This offseason, however, was. They were actively trying to do things. But they ultimately didn’t. So now they have to do more things next summer.
guadzilla
Sorry, i did mean off-season. Sloppy phrasing on my part.
Technically, it is true they didnt do much. But that failure to do anything doesnt necessarily mean much, as NOW is not when they need to do something – it is by 2026.
Jeff Iannuzzi
What opportunity did they miss? They had no cap space and a good not great top draft pick. We can sit in our office chairs all day and hypothesize on trades they should have made, but it takes two to tango. Honestly surprised on your take, which sounds closer to a WIP caller than your usual logical analysis. They have assets they could move during the season as injuries occur, cap space is banked, and teams prepare for the playoffs. They increased their assets in a potentially better draft than 2024. Flexibility in the 2025 draft with draft capital and cap space could be when the team rebounds in earnest.
Charlie O'Connor
AuthorThis rebuild isn’t going to work if the Flyers just sit on their hands and wait. They don’t have enough talent, and they’re not likely to draft in spots where impact-level, top-of-the-lineup talent is unearthed. And that’s intentional. They’ve chosen not to tear it down and bottom out. They’ve purposely chosen to stay competitive.
Which means that to get the talent they need to be Cup contenders, they need to make (and win) trades. This offseason was an opportunity to do that. They didn’t. Therefore, it’s a missed opportunity, by definition. If they have a monster 2025 offseason, it won’t matter that they missed this opportunity. But we have no idea if they are going to successfully have a monster 2025 offseason. We do know they didn’t have a monster 2024 offseason, though. Which is why it’s a missed opportunity.
Bob MCH
Agree. Yep. Draft positions going forward with this strategy will not be where stars are found. As I point out in below comment, the 3 picks they get next year will all be in the 20 to 30 area. That is not getting the job done. That is not where elite talent is procured. They have to make and as you say, win, trades, be willing to lose a lot, give up a few pearls like Konecny, and get top 10 picks.
Jeff Iannuzzi
Sure they should just go out and “win trades”. Who is available they should have traded for? I disagree with your main point (I think) that there was opportunity to even miss. I understand they’ll need top end talent but my point is that I don’t believe this offseason had the players available that matched up with our assets and cap space.
rebusflyer
100% agree with you. The fact that Briere didn’t close any trades almost certainly wasn’t a missed opportunity, it was because there were no trades that made sense to Briere. He undoubtedly could have made trades that would have been splashy and brought in, for example, a center with first line potential, but if, hypothetically, the cost had been Konecny, Farabee, Frost, Ersson, and all three 2025 first rounders, I doubt many people would have been praising Briere for taking advantage of that “opportunity.” Instead, he would have been criticized (justifiably, IMHO) for having been taken advantage of.
MarioD
The problem I see is that now they have a lot of pressure to move up in the 2025 draft which they just tried to do in 2023 and 2024 and were unable to accomplish.
What reason is there to believe they’ll succeed on the third go around?
guadzilla
There was no real expectation that they would move up in 2023. This is the NHL, not the NFL – teams rarely trade away top 5 picks. So that statement of yours is incorrect.
Yes, it is true that they were unable to do so in 2024. What does that have to do with future transactions? Just because you are unable to come to an agreement with one seller when it comes to making a purchase doesnt mean you are unable to make a purchase at all. Knowing when to walk away from a deal is a very useful skill – if Chuck Fletcher knew how to do that, for example, we wouldn’t be where we are now.
rebusflyer
👍👍🙏🙏👍👍
Bob MCH
Charlie, very good article, one of the best you have done this year. Here is my comment. Briere and company have erred in one key respect: The 3 draft picks they get next year will all be in the mid 20 area of the draft, that does not produce superstar elite prospects. Torts was one game from getting them to playoffs this year, and with MM, will for sure get them in this coming year, hence their draft pick in round 1 will be mid 20’s. The Edmonton pick could be closer to 30, as could the Colorado pick.
So, three mid to late first rounders and three second rounders is NOT going to get the job done to find stars, much needed stars to complement MM. The GM work has to improve. Get stars, not a quantity of 3rd liners.
guadzilla
I wouldn’t say they have erred. They did what they could. The only teams forking out 1st round pick at the trade deadline are those making a deep run. Teams that are rebuilding dont go around trading their high picks.
FWIW, i dont think a depth/balanced approach is that bad, either. They will soon have the cap space to take on a couple of big-ticket FAs, and the picks to trade for them.
2025 is going to be a significant year.
jamesiy
Nice summary of the offseason, keep up the great work, I love reading your stuff & listening to the pod!!
One point I’d make though is that having more to do going forward isn’t just about this lackluster offseason. Despite the improvements you noted on the ice, off the ice last year was a disaster for the franchise from a 30,000 foot view.
At this point last year they had 2x blue chip prospects, a franchise goalie, cap space and were looking to be in the running for a 3rd blue chipper at the 2024 draft. Fast forward 1 year and they have 1 blue chip prospect, no franchise goalie and no cap space. Not the progress a lot of people hoped for.
It’s going to be a long road up picking in the mid-teens – 2 more losses and Dickenson would have left people feeling a lot better. Hopefully Edmonton goes the way of a couple recent cup losers and that pick ends up at 15/17/19 like 4 of the last 8 have.
Bob MCH
Good point, losing Gauthier really hurt, and Drysdale is not equal value in return.
Charlie O'Connor
AuthorI would note that the Flyers were very aware this time last year that Carter Hart was unlikely to be in their long-term plans. That’s not a new development. It might have been to the fans, but it wasn’t internally. That’s why they signed Ersson to an extension a year early.
Bob MCH
Another thought: Obviously I was not privy to any negotiations for a trade this off season, however, one has to believe a trade offer of Konecny and their first round pick at # 12 would have gotten them a move up pick to land Catton for their future high probability 1-C in the same age bracket as MM. That is the sort of GM move that had to be made for this rebuild and did not happen. Sometimes you have to overpay to get what you need at a key position. I even would have thrown another player on top of K to get something like this done, maybe even add a 2nd rounder pick or two. If Catton is that good, you have to make the deal.
guadzilla
If you are a team drafting in the top 7-8 (ie, also a rebuilding team), why would you take on Konecny?
Bob MCH
Why not if you get the # 12 pick and a few other future #2’s? Of course you might. To drop back 5 spots or so? Sure someone would have.
guadzilla
I dunno. A rebuilding team will have exactly the same calculus re TK that we do – currently in his prime but will be on the decline by the time they start contending.
I mean, is it possible? Sure. The Flyers did, by all a positive note, try to aggressively move up in the draft. Who knows what was dangled.
Michael Perez
Ok. I doubt this is the actual plan, but I think the top 10 pick next year will be our own. This team is the team we saw the last 30 games with a one more weapon that’s going to give away as many goals as they score at first. Do we wanna take bets on which D gets injured first to let EJ into regular playing time? How many games is cal Peterson in net? what’s the ice under on coots games played? I think fans that are counting on same or slightly better outcome from this team are going to be sorely mistaken. This is the tank year to the extent torts will allow it.
guadzilla
If I had to guess, I would say Tort’s focus this season is going to be in building up Michkov’s game – that is probably more important than W/L records.
As an aside, i am not sure i see why people are so worried about how Torts and Michkov are going to coexist.
For starters, Torts has been surprisingly flexible and nuanced with how he approaches players and gets them to play to their strengths – eg, with TK, he’s publicly accepted a certain level of defensive shortcomings in order to let TK be TK. Even with his handling of Frost (to which Charlie has taken an exception to since his days at the other place), it definitely seems to be aimed at getting Frost to play better – and it has worked to some degree.
Second – I dont really think Michkov is going to have an issue with playing for a coach who wants him to exceed. Have read several reports about how hyper-competitive he is.
Lastly – do we necessarily WANT a forward who ignores the defensive game entirely? We dont need Michkov to become a Selke forward but we dont need him to hang out at the red line waiting for a pass either. Somewhere between the two extremes, there is a sweet spot which maximizes Michkov’s offensive skills but also helps him develop into a more rounded player. Given how accepting Torts was of TK’s defensive shortcomings in the interest of his offensive creativity, i dont think he will be too unreasonable with Michkov.
Be that as it may, i am really looking forward to this season. The Flyers were a lot less painful to watch last year with their *significantly* improved structural play – now, adding a player of Michkov’s creativity should make them fun.
Bob MCH
And that is the point: Torts will not allow a tank. Wrong coach for a tank. He is good for 10 system wins a season, and Flyers will make playoffs next season. Book it. They hired him 3 years too soon. Should have tanked for 3 years, got three elite prospects, then hired Torts. In five years Flyers will be where nobody wants them, in the middle of the pack. Why? Because they did not tank, and they hired an elite coach without elite talent, so drafts are in the 15 to 25 area where 3rd liners are found.